GOAL: To determine
whether or not the DAEP at the Mesquite
Learning Center
is academically effective for long-term elementary students.
|
OUTCOMES
|
ACTIVITIES
|
RESOURCES/ RESEARCH TOOLS NEEDED
|
RESPONSIBILITY TO ADDRESS ACTIVITIES
|
TIME LINE
|
Benchmarks/
ASSESSMENT
|
Revisions to SIP/
PIP based on
monitoring and
assessments
|
|
-Determine whether or not the DAEP is effective for
long-term elementary students.
|
-Examine data of long-term elementary students. Data
will be both previous and on-going assessments and grades.
|
-Previous assessments/test scores and grades of
students entering into the DAEP
|
-Natalie Stewart (me)
|
-Beginning August 27, 2012
|
|
- Begin to
formulate a more
definite solution
if there is a
problem.
|
|
-Show that elementary students at the DAEP do not
loose academic ground.
|
-Collect assessments (benchmarks, milestones, etc.)
of students while at the L.C.
|
-Pre-test and post-test
|
-Keith Adams (building principal and site
supervisor)
|
-Ending June 6, 2013
|
|
-Determine pros
and cons of
plausible
solutions with
site supervisor.
|
|
|
-Continually monitor the academic progress of
students.
|
-Computer spread sheet such as Excell
|
-Donna McAda (Administrative Officer)
|
-The steps in between start and end will be
determined as students enter and leave the Learning Center.
|
|
-Identify pit-falls
before
implementing
solution.
|
|
|
-Share findings with other faculty and staff
(particularly elementary teachers),
|
-I will need last years STAAR test results as well
as the pre-tests and post-tests we will be giving the students as they enter
and leave the L.C.
|
-Debbie Shewmake (Administrative Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Schedule collaborative meetings with site
supervisor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engage in self-reflection and ask reflective
questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|